Geometric phases , gauge symmetries and ray representation
نویسنده
چکیده
The conventional formulation of the non-adiabatic (Aharonov-Anandan) phase is based on the equivalence class {eiα(t)ψ(t, ~x)} which is not a symmetry of the Schrödinger equation. This equivalence class when understood as defining generalized rays in the Hilbert space is not generally consistent with the superposition principle in interference and polarization phenomena. The hidden local gauge symmetry, which arises from the arbitrariness of the choice of coordinates in the functional space, is then proposed as a basic gauge symmetry in the non-adiabatic phase. This re-formulation reproduces all the successful aspects of the non-adiabatic phase in a manner manifestly consistent with the conventional notion of rays and the superposition principle. The hidden local symmetry is thus identified as the natural origin of the gauge symmetry in both of the adiabatic and non-adiabatic phases in the absence of gauge fields, and it allows a unified treatment of all the geometric phases. The non-adiabatic phase may well be regarded as a special case of the adiabatic phase in this re-formulation, contrary to the customary understanding of the adiabatic phase as a special case of the non-adiabatic phase. Some explicit examples of geometric phases are discussed to illustrate this re-formulation.
منابع مشابه
ua nt - p h / 06 05 08 1 v 2 1 6 M ay 2 00 6 Geometric phases , gauge symmetries and ray representation
The conventional formulation of the non-adiabatic (Aharonov-Anandan) phase is based on the equivalence class {eiα(t)ψ(t, ~x)}. This equivalence class when understood as defining generalized rays in the Hilbert space is not generally consistent with the superposition principle in interference and polarization phenomena. The hidden local gauge symmetry, which arises from the arbitrariness of the ...
متن کاملua nt - p h / 06 05 08 1 v 1 9 M ay 2 00 6 Geometric phases , gauge symmetries and ray representation
The conventional formulation of the non-adiabatic (Aharonov-Anandan) phase is based on the equivalence class {eα(t)ψ(t, ~x)}. This equivalence class when understood as defining generalized rays in the Hilbert space is not generally consistent with the superposition principle in interference and polarization phenomena. The hidden local gauge symmetry, which arises from the arbitrariness of the c...
متن کاملGauge symmetries in geometric phases
The analysis of geometric phases is briefly reviewed by emphasizing various gauge symmetries involved. The analysis of geometric phases associated with level crossing is reduced to the familiar diagonalization of the Hamiltonian in the second quantized formulation. A hidden local gauge symmetry becomes explicit in this formulation and specifies physical observables; the choice of a basis set wh...
متن کاملPhases and Residual Gauge Symmetries of Higgs Models
After elimination of the redundant variables, gauge theories may still exhibit symmetries associated with the gauge fields. The role of these residual gauge symmetries is discussed within the Abelian Higgs model and the Georgi-Glashow model. In the different phases of these models, these symmetries are realized differently. The characteristics of emergence and disappearance of the symmetries ar...
متن کاملua nt - p h / 05 10 04 9 v 1 7 O ct 2 00 5 Berry ’ s phases and topological properties in the Born - Oppenheimer approximation 1
The level crossing problem is neatly formulated by the second quantized formulation, which exhibits a hidden local gauge symmetry. The analysis of geometric phases is reduced to a simple diagonalization of the Hamiltonian. If one diagonalizes the geometric terms in the infinitesimal neighborhood of level crossing, the geometric phases become trivial (and thus no monopole singularity) for arbitr...
متن کامل